Thinking
Brand transformation. Then comes Year Two.
Let me tell you something I learned the hard way.
When clients start on a brand transformation journey, the most thrilling, intense, nerve-wracking part is getting the strategy (and design system) right. Those first months of a project can be like emotional mountaineering. Getting everyone excited. Making it look beautiful. Showing a path.
So much effort, resource and focus is put on a single – seemingly finite – task.
Then comes Year Two.
Delivery. Implementation. Scale.
Year Two kills more beautifully crafted brands than consultants ever will.
Year Two is the moment the fundamental tension between the archetypal ideal of a brand and its manifestation in reality happens.
Year Two is about to throw ideas against the wall of reality so hard it'll make your head spin. Not with a bang. But with a thousand tiny compromises.
Top-down brand rollouts, where HQ hands down stone tablets of guidelines, are over. Employees have TikTok, subsidiaries have their own cultures, and regional offices move at the speed of market opportunity, not brand approval processes.
Your perfectly ordered brand system meets the unforgiving reality of human nature. People resist. People interpret. People modify. This isn't dysfunction – it's the natural order reasserting itself against imposed structure.
Successfully riding Year Two takes a different type of skill: storytelling, adaptation and engagement. And often requires a different set of decision makers. It requires great humility and tremendous resilience to know when to push and when to listen. Successful brand transformations are the ones that understand that brand building isn't an exercise in control – it's an exercise in empowerment.
Typically, businesses should keep in mind four things:
1. People: Companies clinging to perfect control are the corporate equivalent of helicopter parents – creating dependency while preaching empowerment. The truth is, control leads to disengagement. No one watches the training. No one reads the CEO interview. No one opens the email beyond its “A future together” headline. People equate change to bad news. It’s crucial to tackle that mindset directly. Your brand must breathe. Control needs to be in the hands of the people who make the company live everyday. Onboard them properly. It’s hard. It’s key.
2. Portfolio integration: Transformation often comes with new brand architecture. Successful rebrands focus on migration paths, not on designing the cleanest brand architecture slides. Success is building a system for scale that treats brands as an operating system for growth, not a static picture. When Facebook became Meta, they didn't just change their logo – they spent billions integrating their portfolio. Your acquired companies don't need new business cards; they need migration paths that preserve value while building future equity.
3. Tools: I've seen the most successful brand programs spend 20% on guidelines and 80% on tools. Spotify doesn't control their brand through manuals – they built Spotify.design, a living system that evolves with their business. You invested in a new brand, but did you invest in the systems and platforms to use it properly? Guidelines tell people what to do. Tools let them do it.
4. Measurements: Wisdom measures progress, not perfection. Unless you're a fully digital brand, with few markets, the transition is likely to feel like chaos when it meets thousands of daily decisions that your guidelines didn't prepare for. Transformation is a process, not a destination. Challenges, diversity and adversity are making the system stronger, if you let them. Iterate along the way, and re-assess things. The goal isn't to eliminate variance but to channel it productively. Create brand clinics and brand health checks. Circle back to humility and resilience.
This isn't just theory. This is battle-tested reality. You may have heard “your brand isn't your logo.” Well, your brand isn't what you put in your guidelines either. It's what happens when your guidelines hit reality. And remember, the true test isn't in the boardroom – it's in the market.